Radio Blue Heart is on the air!
savedfromsalvation:
“Truth!!”
  1. db-1986 said: @militantinremission Knowledge and hopefully understanding to you.
  2. db-1986 said: @militantinremission and your understanding isn’t abstract, it’s absurd. As it follows no teaching outside of creation.
  3. militantinremission said: @db-1986 Lol! -Peace & Blessings 2 U
  4. db-1986 said: @militantinremission The field of genetics itself is VERY new, but evolution is not new at all. And playing the race card, is pretty lame. Especially when you are still yet to provide any evidence or citations.
  5. db-1986 said: @militantinremission Evolution is not new. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki…
  6. militantinremission said: @db-1986 Genetic Evolution is relatively new. I drank the Kool- Aid in College, but I later learned that the whole notion of Genetic Evolution was an Agenda 2 rationalize White Supremacy. From a Black Perspective, this has been the Case 4 over 150Yrs. Racist Acts rationalized by these ‘Scientific Theories’. The Phenomenon of Mutation is real, but I no longer believe it’s accurate 2 call it Evolution… I understand this may B somewhat Abstract
  7. db-1986 said: @militantinremission Biological evolution has never been a spiritual journey. It has always been a scientific one.
  8. militantinremission said: @db-1986 5Yrs ago, I wouldn’t have an argument. 2day, w/ a better understanding of WordPlay & Semantics, ‘Evolution’ has traditionally been defined as a Spiritual Journey. Mutations R a fact of Nature. I agree w/ Ur Substance, but not Ur Definition.
  9. db-1986 said: @militantinremission But why don’t you believe it? Really not trying to be an asshole. I’m very curious. With all the evidence, what changed your mind.
  10. db-1986 said: @militantinremission Ya, I guess I can tell you the facts, I just can’t force you to be correct.
  11. militantinremission said: @db-1986 Lol, again- Years of Genetics Study. I get it. I’m just not sure if that’s true anymore. -We can agree 2 disagree
  12. db-1986 said: @militantinremission evolution does not mean the death of the parent species. It’s a branching effect. For humans, our closest living relative is the chimpanzee. If the parent species of humans had died off that would mean that chimpanzees could not have evolved. Instead there was a splitting of the parent species into two daughter species the lineage of humans and the lineage of chimpanzees.
  13. militantinremission said: @db-1986 In regard 2 Human Evolution, there R some Anthropologists & Archaeologists that believe that Homo Habilus, Erectus, Neaderthalis, Cromagnus, & Sapien ALL existed @ the Same Time… That’s why I don’t know anymore. Once I would’ve agreed w/ U wholeheartedly. Now, I looking 4 more info. That’s why I really can’t give U the answers We were taught. I trust My Opinion more these Days.
  14. db-1986 said: @militantinremission Mutations are one of the drivers of evolution. yourgenome.org/stories…
  15. militantinremission said: @militantinremission I say Mutation, U say Evolution.
  16. db-1986 said: @militantinremission genetic lineage is evidence of evolution. And yes, humans very much evolved.
  17. militantinremission said: @db-1986 For The Record, I enjoy Adult discourse, & I don’t mean 2 insult- I may have misinterpreted Ur earlier comment in regard 2 ‘Evolution’. I was talking about Human 'Evolution’. In regard 2 Biological Evolution- I don’t know. I studied Genetics & Anthropology, so excuse my arrogance; I can acknowlege Genetic Lineage, but not so sure if that can B called Evolution. -Just My Opinion
  18. db-1986 said: @militantinremission PS. Darwin’s beliefs about race are not part of Darwinian evolution.
  19. db-1986 said: @militantinremission And I feel that the human condition includes knowledge and we have gained alot of that. But you should also probably say what you mean, because what you said meant something completely different.
  20. db-1986 said: @militantinremission Well you say that, but you haven’t shown anything. And Hitchens Razor states that what can be stated without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.
  21. militantinremission said: @db-1986 In regard 2 Darwinism, there is just as much info available showing that the purpose was 2 substantiate White Supremacy. It’s implied in the Full Title of Darwin’s ‘Origin Of Species’. It also inspired The Eugenics Movement in America. -Just Sayin’
  22. militantinremission said: @db-1986 Lol, Well said… In regard 2 ‘Nothing New under The Sun, i’m saying that Humanity has not evolved Mentally & Spiritually; in fact, Our Society has devolved. The 'Human Condition’ that I refer 2, is the Same Condition that allowed Feudalism 2 exist, & the Empires of Greece, Rome, Khazaria, Persia, China, ect… We behave The Same Way that Our Ancestors behaved; We just have better Technology. -That’s My Point
  23. db-1986 said: @militantinremission of ya. And this is darwinism Dar·win·ism /ˈdärwənˌizəm/ Learn to pronounce noun the theory of the evolution of species by natural selection advanced by Charles Darwin. It is NOT a view to eugenics or race superiority. It is a single theory of biological evolution.
  24. db-1986 said: -Just Sayin
  25. db-1986 said: @militantinremission But my problem came from the “Nothing New under The Sun” comment. To which, may I introduce the very much proven theory of evolution.
  26. db-1986 said: @militantinremission Your original statement is that “people R basically the same as We have always been”. To which my definition of people are all human species in the genus homo. Of which there has been a myriad of changes in biology, culture, understand and knowledge. And those things can be applied to just Homo Sapien.
  27. db-1986 said: @militantinremission But I’d love to hear what you think the human condition is.
  28. db-1986 said: @militantinremission Too bad you didn’t say human condition.
  29. db-1986 said: @militantinremission PS. Genetic manipulation is what drives evolution. Humans just take the natural processes and speeds them up.
  30. militantinremission said: @db-1986 I see Ur list… Again, in regard 2 the initial conversation, how is this relevant? The Human Condition has not evolved, just Our Technology.
  31. db-1986 said: @militantinremission But I honestly don’t expect any actual evidence from you. Doubt you would take a look at a single link I posted. But I guarantee you will post more conspiracy bullshit that only seems to work in your head, won’t you?
  32. militantinremission said: I’d like 2 see Ur evidence. R U talking about Fossils & ‘Dinosaur’ bones? How does THAT relate 2 the evolution of Wo/Man?
  33. db-1986 said: @militantinremission youtube.com/playlis… A basic start to finish of human evolution.
  34. db-1986 said: @militantinremission youtube.com/playlis… How birds are dinosaurs.
  35. db-1986 said: @militantinremission britannica.com/animal/…evolution.berkeley.edu/…ugc.berkeley.edu/backgro…
  36. db-1986 said: @militantinremission Prove your claim. Because there is a shit ton of evidence for evolution.
  37. militantinremission said: @db-1986 LOL!!! Seriously? Darwinism was simply a ploy 2 rationalize White Supremacy. What creatures have U EVER heard scientists say Evolved from 1 Species 2 another; aside from genetic manipulation? We should have evidence of it. -Just Saying
  38. db-1986 reblogged this from fuckyeahreligionpigeon
  39. db-1986 said: @militantinremission May I introduce you to evolution?
  40. blindbeholder reblogged this from fuckyeahreligionpigeon
  41. fuckyeahreligionpigeon posted this