vague-humanoid

@socialistexan @chrisdornerfanclub @redstarovermoundcity @karpad @mrchicsaraleo

Centrism so strong you can't say nazis were morally terrible

Also, peep teachers have to ignore students who express suicidal thoughts

vague-humanoid
Neutral on Nazism: Indiana lawmaker walks back remark that teachers must be impartial Sen. Scott Baldwin says he wasn't clear when he seemed to tell teachers they needed to be impartial when teaching about fascism, Nazism and The Indianapolis Star


Senate Bill 167 - Education matters Education matters. Defines a "qualified school". Requires each qualified school to post educational activities and curricular materials on t Indiana General Assembly
libraford

Oh yeah, this bill is THAT BAD. Every one of my Hoosier educator friends is pissed. Essentially, this gives power to the parents over what their children are taught in public school, which from an outside perspective sounds great but... its indiana.

There are a lot of hate groups in indiana. And I know we like to joke that they're losers who live in their moms basement, but the truth is that most of them have school age kids. This gives them power to decide what should and should not be taught.

They tell you that this is because of Critical Race Theory. Your child is not going to learn Critical Race Theory unless they're taking college level law courses. This is about control.

infectedwithnyanites

Parents should not have the power to keep their children ignorant of history education should be independent of the parents will even if it's against the parents will a child is not a piece of their property it is a young person with equal rights which they've been entrusted with caring for.

History is not neutral there is no such thing as an unbiased perspective all teaching of history adopts a stance about the moral character of events depending on whose interests the narrators serve. To talk apologetics for nazis is to serve nazism that's a very dark path to walk down and let me tell you history will not be neutral in its sentiments about the ones who allowed it to happen.

Parents can sometimes be and I speak from direct experience the source of their child's misery parents can abuse their child to the point they start contemplating suicide to prohibit a teacher from engaging with expressions of suicidal ideation is to force them to turn a blind eye to open calls for help leaving them at the mercy of their abusers.

theculturedmarxist

At a Twitter all-hands meeting on March 22, an employee asked a blunt question: Twitter has largely eradicated Islamic State propaganda off its platform. Why can’t it do the same for white supremacist content?

theculturedmarxist

infectedwithnyanites:

libraford:

vague-humanoid:

vague-humanoid:

@socialistexan @chrisdornerfanclub @redstarovermoundcity @karpad @mrchicsaraleo

Centrism so strong you can't say nazis were morally terrible

Also, peep teachers have to ignore students who express suicidal thoughts

Neutral on Nazism: Indiana lawmaker walks back remark that teachers must be impartial Sen. Scott Baldwin says he wasn't clear when he seemed to tell teachers they needed to be impartial when teaching about fascism, Nazism and The Indianapolis Star


Senate Bill 167 - Education matters Education matters. Defines a "qualified school". Requires each qualified school to post educational activities and curricular materials on t Indiana General Assembly

Oh yeah, this bill is THAT BAD. Every one of my Hoosier educator friends is pissed. Essentially, this gives power to the parents over what their children are taught in public school, which from an outside perspective sounds great but... its indiana.

There are a lot of hate groups in indiana. And I know we like to joke that they're losers who live in their moms basement, but the truth is that most of them have school age kids. This gives them power to decide what should and should not be taught.

They tell you that this is because of Critical Race Theory. Your child is not going to learn Critical Race Theory unless they're taking college level law courses. This is about control.

Parents should not have the power to keep their children ignorant of history education should be independent of the parents will even if it's against the parents will a child is not a piece of their property it is a young person with equal rights which they've been entrusted with caring for.

History is not neutral there is no such thing as an unbiased perspective all teaching of history adopts a stance about the moral character of events depending on whose interests the narrators serve. To talk apologetics for nazis is to serve nazism that's a very dark path to walk down and let me tell you history will not be neutral in its sentiments about the ones who allowed it to happen.

Parents can sometimes be and I speak from direct experience the source of their child's misery parents can abuse their child to the point they start contemplating suicide to prohibit a teacher from engaging with expressions of suicidal ideation is to force them to turn a blind eye to open calls for help leaving them at the mercy of their abusers.

"Similar political parties"

I wonder who they could mean

With every sort of content filter, there is a tradeoff, he explained. When a platform aggressively enforces against ISIS content, for instance, it can also flag innocent accounts as well, such as Arabic language broadcasters. Society, in general, accepts the benefit of banning ISIS for inconveniencing some others, he said.

In separate discussions verified by Motherboard, that employee said Twitter hasn’t taken the same aggressive approach to white supremacist content because the collateral accounts that are impacted can, in some instances, be Republican politicians.

In case anyone was wondering.