In case you think the Rittenhouse verdict is an aberration, here are four other examples of the US justice system permitting fascists to use lethal violence against their opponents with total impunity:
1) The Greensboro Massacre, 1979:
In 1979, three dozen KKK members got the police in Greensboro, NC to turn a blind eye to the ambush they were planning for an anti-racist march. The KKK members fired on the anti-racists, killing five and wounding ten others. No one was ever convicted.
2) Dan Shersty and Lin “Spit” Newborn, 1998:Dan and Spit were two young anti-racist organizers in Las Vegas. In 1998, a gang of nazis lured them out to the desert and shot them to death. Two of the nazis were acquitted of the murders in a trial 16 years later; a third was never even charged.
3) Sacramento 2016:Nazis attending a white supremacist rally at the California state capitol arrived armed with knives and guns and stabbed nine counter-protestors while the police blithely looked on. Afterward, the police actively colluded with the nazis to frame the counter-protestors who had been stabbed.
4) Black Lives Matter Protests, 2020:In addition to the three people killed or maimed by Rittenhouse, fascists attacked at least 53 other Black Lives Matter protests in the US, killing seven others and injuring an 61 additional people; To our knowledge, none have been convicted. Internationally, fascists & far-right bigots murdered at least 326 people and injured 1187 others last year.
It is folly to expect the US justice system - or any country’s legal system - to hold fascists accountable for the violence they visit upon their opponents & our communities. Community-based organizing and collective self-defence are all we have to protect ourselves from their terror.
plantsteaandarcticmonkeys liked this
cantdewwrite reblogged this from prole-log
cantdewwrite liked this
eabeneo3 liked this
bisexualvalve reblogged this from marxistprincess cozyvirtualism reblogged this from antifainternational
zippymoth reblogged this from antifainternational
zippymoth liked this
nemesis2006 liked this destroybeginagain reblogged this from antifainternational
hiko73 reblogged this from secretly-goth
yenoodlethings liked this
mini-lesbian liked this
satuhati93 said:
Away the fact that he was attacked
satuhati93 said:
It wasn’t Ziminski he allegedly pointed his rifle at…the guy was black with yellow pants…not older white and a convicted felon! Watch the video…do your research.
You don’t even know but you are prepared to go along with false information. If you really want to make an informed decision watch both the state and the defence questioning. I still think it was inflammatory to bring a weapon but he wasn’t the only one….and whatever I think about that it doesn’t take aridara said: @932089 Ah yes. “I didn’t point a rifle at Ziminski, I only TOLD him that I pointed my rifle at him to defuse the situation. Even though literally nobody would have thought that saying that would’ve defused the situation. Just do as you’ve been trained to and uncritically accept that the white shooter is always right.”
satuhati93 said:
youtu.be/JG8PhtF… time stamp 1:36:14
Under cross-examination from Mr Binger representing the state
satuhati93 said:
Start over
satuhati93 said:
Haha I sat through about 4 hours of it, would you like me to time stamp it for you?
satuhati93 said:
And with regards inadmissible evidence I was referring to the previous remarks Rittenhouse had allegedly said about shooting shoplifters aridara said: @932089 Yes. Yes, I do think that. Because I listened to Rittenhouse’s testimony - and you clearly did not. Start over.
satuhati93 said:
Justify Rosenbaum chasing and attacking him?….
satuhati93 said:
Have a laser sight….and that was what the guy had seen.
And please tell me….even if it had of been true … please….how does that
satuhati93 said:
@aridara LOL…..REALLY?! you actually think Rosenbaum attacked him because he pointed his towards someone…. seriously? You don’t think it might have been because he was putting out fires that maniac was lighting?!
And the ONLY time Rittenhouse said in his testimony was that when ‘yellow pants’ accused him of pointing his gun at him he said, yes. But was being sarcastic, it was later proven that it wasn’t in fact Rittenhouse who had done it because his rifle did not aridara said: @932089 And it’s not “inadmissible evidence”, because it’s based on RITTENHOUSE’S OWN TESTIMONY. THE TESTIMONY THAT HE GAVE AT HIS TRIAL. TESTIMONY THAT O.B.V.I.O.U.S.L.Y WAS ADMITTED.
aridara said: @932089 Address the fact that, before Rosenbaum tried to attack Rittenhouse, Rittenhouse aimed his rifle at a crowd without any valid justification. Because, so far, you’ve always skipped that event, and went straight to when Rosenbaum attacked Rittenhouse. Probably in an attempt to make it look like Rosenbaum attacked Rittenhouse without a valid reason.
satuhati93 said:
If that’s what you think he wanted to do?
Be a grown up and address all the points I have mentioned.
satuhati93 said:
@aridara and…what points have I not addressed? You said he pointed his gun at the crowd….ok yes he did….but you fail to address mine….did he shoot anyone at that point?
You said he pointed his gun at Ziminski….yes….did he shoot Mr Ziminski? No.
You talk about inadmissible evidence that is…as you admitted… circumstantial…that can not be used as it is not pertinent to what happened that night.
Please explain why he did not just go around shooting people
satuhati93 said:
@aridara how about YOU address the FACTS that I have mentioned…or are you too narrow minded and ignorant to do that? I have already addressed each point and discussed them…or do you just ignore that?
satuhati93 said:
@aridara 🤣🤣🤣🤣…as are you my dear aridara said: @932089 Except that, once again, you’re omitting the facts. Start over.
satuhati93 said:
The point of this trial…did he have the right to defend himself? There are a lot of things I don’t agree with but I do believe in those circumstances he had a right to defend, and if he hadn’t had his rifle I am pretty sure Rosenbaum would of killed him. I’m sorry we don’t agree, I respect your opinion as I hope you do mine. 😊
satuhati93 said:
And that pissed him off…he saw a young scared boy and decided to attack him…he was also not taking his medication for psychosis and was pretty much out of control. That first attack sparked a mob mentality and people went after Kyle intending on killing him. Carrying a rifle in public in that state is legal, pointing is legal, Kyle was stupid and god I hate the fact that people ARE allowed to carry guns, in my country we are not, but he was attacked. And that is
satuhati93 said:
And threatened as did all four other people then yes he probably would of fired. Do you think he was the only person carrying a rifle or gun? Absolutely not. I’m not saying he was right to be there, he was a kid…he shouldn’t have been there really but the person who caused this was Rosenbaum…have you seen the video evidence of him shouting the N word, threatening to kill, setting fire to shit? He attacked Rittenhouse because he put out a fire
satuhati93 said:
Did he shoot Ziminski?…no….did he carry a loaded weapon in his hands…yes….was that stupid… probably. But the point of my argument is purely based on the trail and wether he was justified in defending himself. If Ziminski had advanced on him aridara said: @932089 And keep in mind: according to Rittenhouse’s own testimony at the trial, he raised his rifle because he saw a guy - Ziminski - carrying a gun. When asked if Ziminski pointed the gun at him or provoked him in any way, Rittenhouse said “no”. Meaning that Rittenhouse, according to himself, aimed his rifle at the crowd FOR NO VALID REASON. THAT is when Rosenbaum assumed that Rittenhouse was a threat; and attacked him. So again: start over from the beginning.
aridara said: @932089 m.dailykos.com/stories… There you go. Video evidence of Rittenhouse aiming his rifle at people, BEFORE Rosenbaum ever attacked him.
satuhati93 said:
Factual video evidence
satuhati93 said:
Please tell me when he actually did that? Do you have evidence…. because I have seen none. Please tell me… because I have sat through hours of prosecution and hours of depense and that is not true. Yellow pants accused him but it was proven that his gun doesn’t have a laser sight and it was not him. So lovely I have NOT omitted anything… but it’s interesting that you have entirely dismissed everything I’ve said and not once have you addressed or commented on aridara said: @932089 And once again, you omit what happened BEFORE Rosenbaum chased Rittenhouse. Namely, the fact that Rittenhouse threatened people and aimed his rifle at a crowd for no valid reason. Start over. Until you address ALL the facts, every single analysis you make will be incomplete and therefore faulty. Start. Over.
satuhati93 said:
With potentially deadly force, then he had the right to defend.
satuhati93 said:
Whatever reason he went there for that night is actually not the point…the only action he is on trial for are the killings, wounding and potential killing…4 people…all of which attacked him. He never once threatened any other person, not once.
This is all on video..facts. Rosenbaum and others were there to cause trouble, they lit fires and trashed property. That does not mean they should be killed…but…when they took it upon themselves to attack Rittenhouse…
satuhati93 said:
And the crowd and Rosenbaum.
He told him to stop…pointed his gun at him and only fired when that didn’t deter Rosenbaum from attacking.
Fact…. video evidence shows Kyle running away…to the police line…FACT.
He was chased by a mob…of mainly white men…. attached, kicked, hit and had a gun to his head….whilst sat on the ground…video evidence…fact.
satuhati93 said:
@aridara ok so I’m definitely not a white supremacist… fact. Have you actually seen the video footage that shows the car source lot totally destroyed?
Fact… Rosenbaum chased Rittenhouse…with a chain in his hand….chased him after threatening to kill him if …he got him on his own….FACT…that has been seen and heard in video evidence.
Fact… Rittenhouse house was running AWAY… until Rosenbaum threw an unknown object…he was then backed into a corner between aridara said: @932089 “You are only stating part of the facts” - My god, every single time. For far-right defenders, it’s ALWAYS projection. Anyway, you haven’t provided any evidence that the “other car lot” had been destroyed, or that Rosenbaum caused any fire. So those claims are automatically rejected. Good job.
aridara said: @932089 His intentions and state of mind when he went to Kenosha that day are completely relevant to what happened in Kenosha that day. He EXPLICITLY STATED that he wished to shoot “rioters”. Also, once again you omitted the fact that he pointed the rifle at the crowd first, for no valid reason. THEN someone started attacking him back; Rittenhouse killed him, and THAT is when the crowd really started going after him.
antifainternational posted this
1) The Greensboro Massacre, 1979:...In 1979, three dozen KKK members got the police in...
- Show more notes



