Radio Blue Heart is on the air!

antoine-roquentin:

With more than 30 years of experience with the Canadian Armed Forces, Bonvie spoke of how Western militaries are making use of research by du Cluzel and others, and incorporating novel cognitive warfare techniques into their combat activities.

“Cognitive warfare is a new type of hybrid warfare for us,” Bonvie said.

And it means that we need to look at the traditional thresholds of conflict and how the things that are being done are really below those thresholds of conflict, cognitive attacks, and non-kinetic forms and non-combative threats to us. We need to understand these attacks better and adjust their actions and our training accordingly to be able to operate in these different environments.

Although he portrayed NATO’s actions as “defensive,” claiming “adversaries” were using cognitive warfare against them, Bonvie was unambiguous about the fact that Western militaries are developing these tecniques themselves, to maintain a “tactical advantage.”

“We cannot lose the tactical advantage for our troops that we’re placing forward as it spans not only tactically, but strategically,” he said.

Some of those different capabilities that we have that we enjoy all of a sudden could be pivoted to be used against us. So we have to better understand how quickly our adversaries adapt to things, and then be able to predict where they’re going in the future, to help us be and maintain the tactical advantage for our troops moving forward.

Marie-Pierre Raymond, a retired Canadian lieutenant colonel who currently serves as a “defence scientist and innovation portfolio manager” for the Canadian Armed Forces’ Innovation for Defence Excellence and Security Program, also joined the October 5 panel.

“Long gone are the days when war was fought to acquire more land,” Raymond said.

Now the new objective is to change the adversaries’ ideologies, which makes the brain the center of gravity of the human. And it makes the human the contested domain, and the mind becomes the battlefield.

“When we speak about hybrid threats, cognitive warfare is the most advanced form of manipulation seen to date,” she added, noting that it aims to influence individuals’ decision-making and “to influence a group of a group of individuals on their behavior, with the aim of gaining a tactical or strategic advantage.”

Raymond noted that cognitive warfare also heavily overlaps with artificial intelligence, big data, and social media, and reflects “the rapid evolution of neurosciences as a tool of war.”

Raymond is helping to oversee the NATO Fall 2021 Innovation Challenge on behalf of Canada’s Department of National Defence, which delegated management responsibilities to the military’s Innovation for Defence Excellence and Security (IDEaS) Program, where she works.

In highly technical jargon, Raymond indicated that the cognitive warfare program is not solely defensive, but also offensive:

This challenge is calling for a solution that will support NATO’s nascent human domain and jump-start the development of a cognition ecosystem within the alliance, and that will support the development of new applications, new systems, new tools and concepts leading to concrete action in the cognitive domain.”

She emphasized that this “will require sustained cooperation between allies, innovators, and researchers to enable our troops to fight and win in the cognitive domain. This is what we are hoping to emerge from this call to innovators and researchers.”

To inspire corporate interest in the NATO Innovation Challenge, Raymond enticed, “Applicants will receive national and international exposure and cash prizes for the best solution.” She then added tantalizingly,

This could also benefit the applicants by potentially providing them access to a market of 30 nations.

  1. mrfritzteufel reblogged this from master7mindd
  2. unthinkingclunk reblogged this from meshugenist
  3. likeylikes reblogged this from antoine-roquentin
  4. master7mindd reblogged this from somethingaboutsomethingelse
  5. kessilwig reblogged this from meshugenist
  6. 5ht-2a said: some (surface level) links for those who want to think more about this: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ps…(United_States) youtu.be/EJtNmd1…en.wikipedia.org/wiki/St…en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CO…en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ze…en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fa…en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hy…
  7. radioblueheart reblogged this from marxistprincess
  8. agoraphoebe reblogged this from marxistprincess
  9. marxistprincess reblogged this from leftistcrap
  10. thelostarchangel reblogged this from leftistcrap
  11. leftistcrap reblogged this from antoine-roquentin
  12. bisphenol-a reblogged this from antoine-roquentin
  13. gofortheeyes reblogged this from antoine-roquentin
  14. meshugenist reblogged this from plum-soup
  15. ohwyrms reblogged this from somethingaboutsomethingelse
  16. plum-soup reblogged this from antoine-roquentin
  17. hasturphosphur reblogged this from antoine-roquentin
  18. antoine-roquentin posted this