Good.

Lol I wish we were ungovernable

Based

I’d feel hope if even one succeeded.

Also, “asking.” Right, they were just “asking.”

Oh no boo hoo the big bad oppressive government is forcing me to wear a piece of cloth over my mouth for like 15 minutes a day.

People like you don’t deserve to be found.

Oops guess I hit a nerve there

Yes, it does hit a nerve that people like you exist, who believe it’s justified for the state to use force against anyone in order to force them to wear a piece of cloth, or to do anything really.

Yes, I include clothes in that as well as face masks.

People like you would be better off gone, you’re the kind who submit to tyranny and cheer when it comes to others.

No one has any use for you.

Yes, I include clothes in that as well as face masks.

hey i was gonna write a big thing dissecting the logic of your post here and examining the arbitrary ways you alternately defend and condemn the use of force (defending kidnapping but condemning mask laws, though both are the use of force to achieve a social goal) but then i noticed this and…

i’m sorry are you arguing that public nudity and flashing should be legal? like i just want to clarify that, are you saying anyone who thinks maybe there should be laws against waving your bits around in people’s faces in public is a tyranny-lover who the world would be better off without?you gonna start picketing for flasher rights now? lmao

@vaporwavevocap expanding on this: presumably, you don’t take issue with people using force to prevent nudity on their private property- whether in the form of someone kicking someone’s ass when they get their bits out at their house party or having security escort someone out when they get their bits out in the mall- so how, exactly, do you delineate one use of force to prevent public nudity from the other? if the state were to jump through enough hoops to declare itself a private entity and he country to be it’s property, would that change your position on their ability to enforce laws on nudity? and what hoops would those be, exactly? where do you draw that line? or, conversely, if a private entity were to buy up all land, and to then act largely identical to a state in their behavior (call taxes rent instead, but otherwise identical) would you take issue with that? at what point does organized use of force by a group of people become a “state”?