luvtheheaven:

enbees-and-aros:

erudipitous:

arovaricious:

thebibliosphere:

libelula202:

mirandatam:

Oh my g-d??!!!!!!

@thebibliosphere

Oh wow! That’s awesome!

It also recognizes domestic partnerships that aren’t romantic!!!

@aroacepagans

Recognizing and extending rights to people with multiple partners is wonderful news, and its not too long of an article so I definitely reccomend the read!

But if you’re curious, the end of the article is where it talks about recognizing non-romantic partnerships:

“Under the ordinance, domestic partners, whether in groupings of two or more, would not necessarily be romantic partners.

Miles Bratton, 47, said she would consider forming a domestic partnership with Anne-Marie Taylor, 43, whom she called her “platonic lifemate.”

The status would allow them to buy a house together and share benefits, like health insurance, but also to have outside romantic partners, or add a third “nesting partner” if they wished. Ms. Taylor said they had long held back from registering as domestic partners because the language her workplace used seemed to require that they be romantic partners.

“That has not felt right, so we haven’t done it,” she said. “Somerville is coming out and saying, ‘Hey, family can be a lot of other things, other than just two people.’”

This seems like huge news!

( @nextstepcake ;) )