As of mid-2019, Idaho, Montana, and Wyoming are currently pursuing an end to federal protections for grizzly bears, while L!z Cheney (Republican, Wyoming’s sole representative in the House) is making headlines by insulting Indigenous peoples’ bear preservation efforts. After Wyoming attempted to remove grizzly protections, the outcome of the “Crow Indian Tribe et al. v. United States of America et al.” case reinstated some measures. Some of the plaintiffs: Northern Arapaho Elders Society; Crow Creek Sioux Tribe; Standing Rock Sioux Tribe; Pikani Nation, Hopi Nation Bear Clan; Crow Indian Tribe.
Referencing the case, Cheney, in mid-2019, said this:
“The court-ordered relisting of the grizzly was not based on science or
facts, but was rather the result of excessive litigation pursued by
radical environmentalists intent on destroying our Western way of
life.”
Technically, the grizzly’s US distribution is managed as 6 separate population segments, also referred to as recovery zones. In decreasing order of grizzly bear population strength, these areas are:
(1) Northern Continental Divide - about 800 to 1,000 bears (Glacier National Park and the Bob Marshall Wilderness Complex, an extension of the crest of the Canadian Rockies, providing a contiguous corridor for Canadian grizzlies to enter the US) (2) Greater Yellowstone ecosystem - 600 to 800 bears (3) Selkirk Mountains - about 85 bears (4) Cabinet-Yaak ecosystem - about 50 bears
(5) North Cascades region - less than 20 bears
The crest of the Bitterroot Range and the Selway-Bitterroot Wilderness is also technically considered a formal grizzly recovery zone, but management agencies and organizations formally say that there are no grizzlies currently residing here. This isn’t true, however: grizzlies do live or at least travel through in the Bitterroot Mountains. In October 2018, a grizzly was captured/relocated from a golf course near Stevensville, in the Bitterroot Valley. On 15 July 2019, a grizzly was tracked as it travelled through the Bitterroot Valley near Hamilton, eventually returning to the Lochsa-Selway region of central Idaho.
Here’s a map displaying how grizzlies in the Northern Continental Divide and Greater Yellowstone ecosystems wander extensively outside of the recovery zones, wilderness areas, and undeveloped land. (These regions, where bears wander, are displayed in the cross-hatched area, in this map from the US Forest Service.)
From the Interagency Grizzly Bear Committee:
Here’s a look at current (2018) grizzly distribution in the Yellowstone region.
You can watch a neat and oddly satisfying animated map GIF of the past 30 years of Yellowstone-area grizzly bear range expansion : [x]
People familiar with the Yellowstone to Yukon (Y2Y) concept would recognize these habitat corridors in the Northern
Rockies. There is contiguous forested mountain habitat from Alaska,
Yukon, and northern British Columbia which extends along the Canadian
Rockies crest and eastern BC’s Columbia Mountains, through Glacier and
the Bob Marshall Wilderness Complex, through northern Idaho’s
cedar-hemlock forest, and to Yellowstone. The corridor also provides
home to wolverine, fisher, mountain caribou, Rocky Mountain elk, moose,
Canadian lynx, mountain lion, black bear, etc.
Some of those habitat corridors:
31 March 2020:
Lawsuit Challenges Trump Administration’s Authorization to Kill 72 Grizzlies Near Yellowstone: […] [C]hallenging the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s decision to
allow 72 grizzly bears to be killed to accommodate livestock grazing in
Wyoming’s Bridger-Teton National Forest, near Yellowstone National Park.
The grazing program area, approved by the U.S. Forest Service
late last year, encompasses the headwaters of the Green and Gros Ventre
rivers and two designated wilderness areas. The area provides important
habitat for Yellowstone grizzly bears — listed as threatened under the
Endangered Species Act — and other imperiled fish and wildlife species. The
challenged decision authorizes the killing of up to 72 grizzly bears
over the 10-year life of the reauthorized grazing program. The decision
places no limits on killing female bears or cubs, even though females
with cubs live where the proposed killing would be permitted. [Center for Biological Diversity.]
quamatoc said:
Hooold up! Whats wrong with keeping some bears alive? Not to mention that the american way of life is not sustainable (and propably never was).
This blog is mostly so I can vent my feelings and share my interests. Other than that, I am nothing special.
If you don't like Left Wing political thought and philosophy, all things related to horror, the supernatural, the grotesque, guns or the strange, then get the fuck out. I just warned you.