If confirmed, Marshall Billingslea will become the top U.S. executive branch official directly responsible for U.S. human rights policy including civilian security. Billingslea was heavily involved in torture while he served as a senior official to the Pentagon under President Bush.
HERE is a fact sheet detailing Billingslea’s approval of torture including the following:
- “As Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of
Defense, Billingslea recommended the use of
interrogation techniques that constitute torture
or cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment.”
- “In internal Department of Defense (DOD)
meetings in early 2003, Billingslea pressed to
use harsher interrogation procedures on
detainees held at the Guantanamo Bay
detention facility, despite resistance from military
officers.”
- “Billingslea took part in an internal DOD working
group in which he recommended the use of
interrogation techniques that constitute torture.
In early 2003, Billingslea served as a member of
a senior-level working group assembled by DOD
to review the legality and effectiveness of certain
interrogation techniques and to recommend
whether or not to use them. Some members of
the working group, including Billingslea, issued a
report - completed without the knowledge of its
dissenting members - recommending that the
Secretary of Defense authorize the use of 35
interrogation techniques. Several of the
techniques recommended constitute torture or
cruel, inhumane, or degrading treatment. These included sleep deprivation, isolation, use of
phobias, nudity, and threats to transfer
detainees to another country where they would
also be tortured.”
- When reports on detainee treatment was released, Billingslea didn’t raise issue over the torture memo, instead he pushed for even harsher techniques. “These 35 techniques included threats to transfer a detainee to torture, prolonged standing, and slapping. While not all of the harshest techniques Billingslea recommended were immediately approved by Secretary Rumsfeld, many were later implemented to torture or otherwise abuse detainees.”
Billingslea, Rumsfeld, and Guantanamo
The following story details Billingslea and Donald Rumsfeld’s approval of the torture of Guantanamo detainee Mohamedou Ould Slahi:
“Working under Secretary Rumsfeld in July 2003, Billingslea received a copy of the interrogation plan for a detainee at Guantanamo Bay named Mohamedou Ould Slahi. One technique included in the plan, sound modulation, had not been recommended for use by members of the working group. Sound modulation includes playing songs loudly on repeat for long periods of time in order to mentally break a detainee and prevent them from sleeping. The Army Field Manual on interrogations at the time described sleep deprivation, another technique in the plan, as a form of ‘mental torture’.
Billingslea recommended that the Secretary of Defense approve these techniques. He noted that, ‘We don’t see any policy issues with these interrogation techniques,’ and emphasized that the DOD Office of General Counsel determined that they were lawful, despite the fact that some of these techniques constitute torture.
Secretary Rumsfeld approved the techniques recommended by Billingslea, which were subsequently used to torture Slahi despite the fact that Slahi had already agreed to cooperate with his interrogators. Slahi was shackled and forced to stand for long hours with loud music constantly playing. This treatment was repeated for several days. By the end of his torture, documents from the prison suggest Slahi’s mental health was deteriorating. Slahi himself admitted that he had begun hearing voices in his head due to the psychological torture.
The torture with the techniques approved by Billingslea and Secretary Rumsfeld marred attempts to prosecute Slahi. Lieutenant Colonel Stuart Couch, the Marine officer charged with prosecuting Slahi in a military commission, investigated how the evidence for his case was produced, and stated the following: ‘it became clear that what had been done to Slahi amounted to torture.’ In March of 2004, LtCol Couch resigned, noting that this case was tainted by torture and raised many legal and ethical issues.
His hearing starts on Thursday September 19th. If he advances past his hearing (which he probably will, let’s be real) then it will move to a FULL SENATE VOTE which means you have time to contact your senators and tell them to vote against this piece of shit.