We may reject the contention that the ordering of institutions is always defective because the distribution of natural talents and the contingencies of social circumstance are unjust, and this injustice must inevitably carry over to human arrangements. Occasionally this reflection is offered as an excuse for ignoring injustice, as if the refusal to acquiesce in injustice is on a par with being unable to accept death. The natural distribution is neither just nor unjust; nor is it unjust that persons are born into society at some particular position. These are simply natural facts. What is just and unjust is the way that institutions deal with these facts.
“
| — | John Rawls, A Theory of Justice (via philosophybits) |
imissyouasia liked this
pia-writes-things liked this
dew-ontherocks liked this
twnenglish liked this lordsmokerface liked this
gillyanreads reblogged this from philosophybits yolktree liked this
attheexactlyrighttimeandplace reblogged this from philosophybits
attheexactlyrighttimeandplace liked this
philosophy-of-love liked this earanie reblogged this from philosophybits
dfacbiged liked this
thenamedani liked this ghostxiee liked this
davewanderer liked this
mysticalinfluencerstudent liked this donman2112 liked this
nessieac liked this
robalos liked this elsykr liked this
thelibertineking liked this kadylipa liked this
someblog-or-such liked this
purstslik liked this breaduk liked this
yetmezopara liked this findabalancee liked this
moetambourine reblogged this from philosophybits
moetambourine liked this
bloody-hunter reblogged this from philosophybits
volunteerismandanarchy reblogged this from philosophybits
erockthekid liked this lafoliemaniacomelancolique liked this
walkinthedges liked this
lauvra liked this
0nothingatall liked this dissidient liked this
sunnyyellowflower liked this
p010609 reblogged this from philosophybits bewinemyfriend1 liked this
earanie liked this
iamdexter123 liked this
saltandpeppersandwich liked this
philosophybits posted this
- Show more notes