The first known incidents of fragging in South Vietnam took place in 1966, but events in 1968 appear to have catalyzed an increase in fragging. After the Tet Offensive in January and February 1968, the Vietnam War became increasingly unpopular in the United States and among American soldiers in Vietnam, many of them conscripts. With soldiers reluctant to risk their lives in what was perceived as a lost war, fragging was seen by some enlisted men “as the most effective way to discourage their superiors from showing enthusiasm for combat.“
The resentment directed from enlisted men toward older officers was exacerbated by generational gaps, as well as different perceptions of how the military should be conducted. Enforcement of military regulations, especially if done overzealously, led to troops’ complaining and sometimes threats of physical violence directed toward officers.
The total number of known and suspected fragging cases by explosives in Vietnam from 1969 to 1972 totaled nearly 900 with 99 deaths and many injuries. [video]
pure:
pure:
can’t believe america’s new year resolution was to create 20 more “terrorist” groups in the middle east due to their endless bloodthirst
history is a circle
chemicalheart-deactivated202009:
chemicalheart-deactivated202009:
Cool and normal response to the bushfires from the Australian fascist contingent
🤔
It’s worse, they threaten to fire employees who speak out against the company’s business practices in any way:
In the statement, the employee group claimed that Amazon changed its policy in September and that the updated policy “requires employees to seek prior approval to speak about Amazon in any public forum while identified as an employee.”
the linked article doesn’t have a great summary of the actual study (the reality of the document is much less dramatic and really more interesting) and the link in the document is busted so i recommend you at least skim the actual army war college study for context but






