The absurd inclusion of Cuba in the U.S. State Department list of countries it considers to be sponsors of terrorism, a unilateral decision by former President Donald Trump, has generated condemnations from many countries, organizations and personalities around the world, including the U.S.
The Seattle City Council (Washington state) requested that President Joe Biden reverse the inclusion of Cuba on the spurious list. The resolution, signed by Seattle City Clerk Monica Martinez Simmons, also calls for initiating collaboration with the island in the area of health.
A number of other U.S. cities and institutions have stated their opposition to the blockade, as well, while in 2020, more than 14 cities expressed the desire to collaborate with Cuba in combating covid-19, including San Francisco, Richmond and Berkeley.
Yesterday’s outfit for work: SDCC Tokidoki x Gudetama Breakfast Club tee, jeggings, Hello Kitty velour glitter hoodie and new super shiny holographic patent buckle creepers from @tuk_footwear (from their super sale)! Every pair of TUK creepers I have gotten has lasted 10-15 years, so I try to get them whenever they have half (or more!) off sales. Like Doc Martens, worth the price. #ootd #fafafafafashionbeepbeep #EverydayFashion #CheapAssChic #ClearanceFinds #sdccexclusive #tokidokixgudetama #breakfastclub #HelloKitty #glitter #velour #jeggings #iwearblackontheoutsidebecauseblackishowifeelontheinside #tukshoes #creepers #PunkRockGirl #ComicShopGirl #over50style #50andfabulous #agingdisgracefully #MyStyle
https://www.instagram.com/p/CLAfpyYDhMR/?igshid=14jbbwkitriwl
Sarcophagus vs Coffin
As part of their preparations for afterlife some Egyptians purchased a sarcophagus, a coffin and possibly an inner coffin. Coffins were generally made of wood, metal, stone or pottery. The ancient Egyptians believed that the body needed to be preserved here on Earth in order for the soul to have an afterlife.
Although many Ancient Egyptian coffins and sarcophagi are decorated in a somewhat similar manner, each one is specifically made to help the person it was built for obtain passage to the afterlife. Gold and silver was used on some coffins, but this was generally reserved for kings or royalty.
Left: Sarcophagus of King Merneptah, the largest ever found in Egypt.
Right: Wooden coffin of King Ramesses II.
![ultrafacts:
“Source: [x]
Click HERE for more facts”](https://64.media.tumblr.com/d8152377c9a5da6a531e344b39df0797/0959f307d219d058-d5/s500x750/5b1b2b9b9c6561925583746c8888a1f2fe5e0418.png)
The Queen successfully lobbied the government to change a draft law in order to conceal her “embarrassing” private wealth from the public, according to documents discovered by the Guardian.
A series of government memos unearthed in the National Archives reveal that Elizabeth Windsor’s private lawyer put pressure on ministers to alter proposed legislation to prevent her shareholdings from being disclosed to the public.
Following the Queen’s intervention, the government inserted a clause into the law granting itself the power to exempt companies used by “heads of state” from new transparency measures.
The arrangement, which was concocted in the 1970s, was used in effect to create a state-backed shell corporation which is understood to have placed a veil of secrecy over the Queen’s private shareholdings and investments until at least 2011.
The true scale of her wealth has never been disclosed, though it has been estimated to run into the hundreds of millions of pounds.
Evidence of the monarch’s lobbying of ministers was uncovered by a Guardian investigation into the royal family’s use of an arcane parliamentary procedure, known as Queen’s consent, to secretly influence the formation of British laws.
Unlike the better-known procedure of royal assent, a formality that marks the moment when a bill becomes law, Queen’s consent must be sought before legislation can be approved by parliament.
It requires ministers to alert the Queen when legislation might affect either the royal prerogative or the private interests of the crown.
The website of the royal family describes it as “a long established convention” and constitutional scholars have tended to regard consent as an opaque but harmless example of the pageantry that surrounds the monarchy.
But documents unearthed in the National Archives, which the Guardian is publishing this week, suggest that the consent process, which gives the Queen and her lawyers advance sight of bills coming into parliament, has enabled her to secretly lobby for legislative changes.
Thomas Adams, a specialist in constitutional law at Oxford University who reviewed the new documents, said they revealed “the kind of influence over legislation that lobbyists would only dream of”. The mere existence of the consent procedure, he said, appeared to have given the monarch “substantial influence” over draft laws that could affect her.
British monarchists sometimes defend their ridiculous institution by saying that it’s all purely symbolic, that the royal family is just a cultural tradition without any impact on the democratic nature of the British government. The problem with this argument is that it’s false, and there are tons of modern examples where British royalty have successfully lobbied to change the law, often in a harmful way! Anyway, appropriate all of the Queen’s assets
