Many Brazilians wept after their 200-year-old National Museum was destroyed in a devastating fire last September. Twenty million objects, many of them irreplaceable, were thought to have been lost. But eight months later, staff have salvaged more treasures than they expected, and there are hopes that one of the great museums of the world can be brought back to life.
This is excellent news and makes me very happy.
BBC News - Brazil National Museum: ‘Little surprises’ salvaged from the ashes
The current White House occupant used his Twitter
page this week to recount his own harrowing account of the ongoing
impeachment proceeding against him, describing the constitutionally
mandated investigation of his alleged one-president crime wave as “a lynching.”
UNC-Chapel Hill history professor Seth Kotch, an expert on
imprisonment, punishment, the death penalty, and, yes, lynching, had
some thoughts about that.
“Take it from a historian,” Kotch posted on Twitter,
“lynching is not something that can be appropriated by a billionaire
president who wants to do crimes without consequences. But victimhood
apparently can be.”
In an email to the INDY, Kotch — whose latest book, Lethal State: A History of the Death Penalty in North Carolina,
Kotch asserts that lynchings after slavery principally targeted African
American men to preserve white supremacy, and capital punishment in the
state served as an extension of that goal — says there were at least
180 lynchings in North Carolina. The earliest took place just after the
Civil War, with the last documented lynching occurring in 1946.
Kotch says the mob murders in North Carolina had the same purpose
here as in other towns and cities across the South: disrupting black
communities, breaking up black-owned property, stealing black wealth,
and harming and controlling black people.
North Carolina was the scene of “small, private [lynchings], and we had larger ones with many hundreds in attendance.”
Kotch asserts in Lethal State that this was especially the case if the victim in those cases was white.
“Obviously, this isn’t a #lynching,” Kotch wrote in the first of thirteen tweets
he posted in response to the president’s lament. “But this complaint is
really revealing about how lynching was about the perverse and enduring
idea of white male victimhood.”
Kotch then pointed out the obvious, writing that the actual victims
of lynchings have been African Americans, Latinx, Asians, and other
people of color. He added that some white people were lynched, too, but
they weren’t (self-proclaimed) members of the billionaire class who
aligned their business interests with the world’s most autocratic
regimes.
“White men who joined lynch mobs probably often did so as a grotesque
bonding ritual,” he tweeted, “because they believed violence against
non-whites was part of their racial inheritance; and because maintaining
white dominance was materially and symbolically important to them.”
Kotch pointed out that, as aberrant as the act was, it was sanctioned
by mainstream institutions, particularly in the media and law
enforcement: “After the fact though, they explained their deed — and were
given a mouthpiece to by the white-owned news — by imagining themselves as
the real victims. In this deception, the victim of the lynch mob
becomes the ‘beast’ who posed a threat to their communities and their
way of life. The courts amplified that threat by doing little
about it. Sheriffs protected evil-doers rather than punished them.”
Law enforcement, far from protecting the rights of those targeted for
the barbaric act, “participated in the lynchings or covered them up
afterwards. Early in the 1900s, the head of NC’s prison system wrote an
editorial defending lynching!”
“Even without the threat of lynching, courtrooms were often hostile
places for black defendants, who were usually tried before all-white
juries,” Kotch told the INDY.
Kotch points out that poor whites suffered, too — but because they were powerless, not because of race.
“In a nutshell, it shows the way lynching was an expression of white
male victimhood and anti-black male terrorism, rather — as we’ve known
since Ida B. Wells spelled it out for us — than a response to criminal
behavior.”
Kotch adds: “The claim fits perfectly in this day and age as a
distillation of our political moment. If immigrants are attacking us, if
black men threaten the lives of police officers, if transgender people
pose risks to our children … as if we white Americans are under attack,
it makes perfect sense to claim that we white men are the real victims
and the people who you might think are under threat in detention
centers, in jails, on the streets, are in fact threats to us.”
And, Kotch says, no one has exploited poor whites and people of color
for his benefit more than Trump. “The real enemy of poor white people
is rich white people,” he tweeted. “Like our president, a billionaire,
the person in the world with the most power to make people’s lives
better, who revels in suffering: the real suffering he inflicts and the
fake suffering he imagines he experiences.”
Kotch says Trump is trying to lay the groundwork for an argument that
“pre-impeachment is a lynching” by saying that the inquiry is
proceeding without due process.”
This, Kotch says, “indicates a de-raced understanding of lynching — a
legal process that lacked due process, like the hanging of horse thieves
in the Old West or something. Setting aside that lots of lynchings in
the Old West of ‘bandits’ were in fact murders of Mexican people … of
course his inheritance is on the side of the mob. He’s the one who has
committed crimes with impunity. He’s the one with a long track record of
bodily violations of people he seeks to violate. He’s the one who
doesn’t believe the rule of law does not apply to him, that he has the
right to act as he pleases.”
Contact staff writer Thomasi McDonald at tmcdonald@indyweek.com.
Support independent local journalism. Join the INDY Press Club to help us keep fearless watchdog reporting and essential arts and culture coverage viable in the Triangle.
This blog is mostly so I can vent my feelings and share my interests. Other than that, I am nothing special.
If you don't like Left Wing political thought and philosophy, all things related to horror, the supernatural, the grotesque, guns or the strange, then get the fuck out. I just warned you.
