Regulators in North Carolina found artwork by famed artist Ralph Steadman, on Flying Dog’s Freezin’ Season beer, somehow objectionable. Naturally, Flying Dog, who has a history of winning these arguments, has them headed for court.
The offending label—like all Flying Dog beers—contains a distinctive cartoon image by illustrator Ralph Steadman, whose work with the Maryland-based brewery dates back to its roots in the gonzo-lands near Aspen, Colorado. It’s not clear exactly what the state’s regulators object to—though the naked, humanoid figure on the beer’s label does sport a small appendage between its legs. Caruso says he suspects that “tail-like thing” is what triggered the ban.
Officially, however, all Flying Dog has been told is that the label is “inappropriate” and “in bad taste.” That is all it takes for North Carolina to prohibit the beer from being marketed, sold, and distributed. The North Carolina ABC did not return requests for comment on Tuesday.
“The regulation is, on its face, in constitutional ‘bad taste,’ as it is in clear violation of the First Amendment,” attorneys for Flying Dog, including veteran First Amendment lawyers Greg Doucette and Marc Randazza, argue in court documents. They say banning the beer label is an unconstitutional viewpoint-based restriction on speech, similar to restrictions that the U.S. Supreme Court has repeatedly struck down.
I don’t know who keeps trying to say random youtubers and bloggers are at fault for folks inability to read critically, but consider the fact that the average american reads and understands things at the 7th grade level and maybe you will see cinema sins as a symptom of that rather than a cause.
things like cinema sins wouldnt be popular if an audience for their content didnt already exist.
because so many people already have trouble reading between the lines and understanding metaphors and jokes and sarcasm even, content can really take off with these people if it blatantly disregard the existence of metaphors, jokes, sarcasm, foreshadowing, etc.
youtubers didn’t burn down rome in one day 😩
7th grade? We had a whole show called “Are you smarter than a 5th grader” and I dont believe the adults won very often…
Here is my opinion as a recruiter (of course recruiting is highly subjective and everyone has their own biases in hiring)
1. If its your first job after a gap, don’t say its a health reason. They will probably not ask more but they’ll probably mentally downgrade you because ‘Are they really okay to come back to work?’ If it’s further back, it’ll be less of an issue. This goes triple for any job that is physical.
2. Depending on hiring person, I find 'I was caring for a family member full time’ to be a good reason for a gap that I won’t question.
3. If you have the opportunity while in a gap, get a certification or degree. Then you can use that as a reason for your gap and it could potentially turn the view of that gap from negative to positive.
4. If you have a “good” reason, most people understand. I speak to people daily who were a Covid layoff and we don’t count this gap against them. I also sometimes talk to people who have to explain gaps around 2008 with “Well that was during the financial crisis” and I go say no more I understand.
4. If you don’t have a “good” reason, pretend you do. Don’t lie but make it sound like the gap was a thing you chose. “I had the opportunity after leaving my last job to take a few months before looking for work again.” “I was able to work on building my home business (Ebay, etsy, etc), but now I’m looking for something more stable.”
These are all really great and very helpful, thanks for sharing!!!
