With more than 30 years of experience with the Canadian Armed Forces,
Bonvie spoke of how Western militaries are making use of research by du
Cluzel and others, and incorporating novel cognitive warfare techniques
into their combat activities.
“Cognitive warfare is a new type of hybrid warfare for us,” Bonvie said.
And it means that we need to look at the traditional
thresholds of conflict and how the things that are being done are really
below those thresholds of conflict, cognitive attacks, and non-kinetic
forms and non-combative threats to us. We need to understand these
attacks better and adjust their actions and our training accordingly to
be able to operate in these different environments.
Although he portrayed NATO’s actions as “defensive,” claiming
“adversaries” were using cognitive warfare against them, Bonvie was
unambiguous about the fact that Western militaries are developing these
tecniques themselves, to maintain a “tactical advantage.”
“We cannot lose the tactical advantage for our troops that we’re
placing forward as it spans not only tactically, but strategically,” he
said.
Some of those different capabilities that we have that we
enjoy all of a sudden could be pivoted to be used against us. So we
have to better understand how quickly our adversaries adapt to things,
and then be able to predict where they’re going in the future, to help
us be and maintain the tactical advantage for our troops moving forward.
Marie-Pierre Raymond, a retired Canadian lieutenant colonel who
currently serves as a “defence scientist and innovation portfolio
manager” for the Canadian Armed Forces’ Innovation for Defence
Excellence and Security Program, also joined the October 5 panel.
“Long gone are the days when war was fought to acquire more land,” Raymond said.
Now the new objective is to change the adversaries’
ideologies, which makes the brain the center of gravity of the human.
And it makes the human the contested domain, and the mind becomes the
battlefield.
“When we speak about hybrid threats, cognitive warfare is the most
advanced form of manipulation seen to date,” she added, noting that it
aims to influence individuals’ decision-making and “to influence a group
of a group of individuals on their behavior, with the aim of gaining a
tactical or strategic advantage.”
Raymond noted that cognitive warfare also heavily overlaps
with artificial intelligence, big data, and social media, and reflects
“the rapid evolution of neurosciences as a tool of war.”
Raymond is helping to oversee the NATO Fall 2021 Innovation Challenge
on behalf of Canada’s Department of National Defence, which delegated
management responsibilities to the military’s Innovation for Defence
Excellence and Security (IDEaS) Program, where she works.
In highly technical jargon, Raymond indicated that the cognitive warfare program is not solely defensive, but also offensive:
This challenge is calling for a solution that will
support NATO’s nascent human domain and jump-start the development of a
cognition ecosystem within the alliance, and that will support the
development of new applications, new systems, new tools and concepts
leading to concrete action in the cognitive domain.”
She emphasized that this “will require sustained cooperation between
allies, innovators, and researchers to enable our troops to fight and
win in the cognitive domain. This is what we are hoping to emerge from
this call to innovators and researchers.”
To inspire corporate interest in the NATO Innovation Challenge, Raymond
enticed, “Applicants will receive national and international exposure
and cash prizes for the best solution.” She then added tantalizingly,
This could also benefit the applicants by potentially providing them access to a market of 30 nations.
