Radio Blue Heart is on the air!

Mar 23

citystompers:
“ Mothra vs. Godzilla (1964)
”

citystompers:

Mothra vs. Godzilla (1964)

(via dberl)

(via upto18)

[video]

verbix:
“mushroom releasing spores
”

verbix:

mushroom releasing spores

(via upto18)

studiedinapoolofhisownfaeces:

image

eugh..!! pleugh.. cough cough.. eugffh.. bleugjh…. ptoo…

(via mariocki)

pinkcat68:

image

(via upto18)

captainlordauditor:

andthosearesmalleragents:

funnytwittertweets:

image

It also has some interesting medical implications. Does it mean that liposuction is now illegal, because that adipose tissue is healthy? Does it mean that removing appendixes in those going on big expeditions where appendicitis could mean death (such as to the ISS or Antarctica) is illegal, because the appendix is currently healthy? Does it mean breast reduction or mastectomies for those who need them for back pain, or who have very high cancer risks, is illegal, because the breast itself is healthy (nevermind the back or the potential future cancer). Heck, does it mean the safe margin taken when removing a cancer is illegal, because the margin around the cancer wasn’t itself cancer? (although you don’t know that until it’s reviewed under a microscope)

This is a horrible transphobic law, designed by those who clearly have no knowledge of medicine. They just want to hurt, and clearly don’t have the brains or the care to think of the consequences other than securing a few more votes from a few more bigots. But it makes me wonder if the ridiculously ambiguous wording could make it more easy to challenge, because it’ll clearly impact a broader range of people than it meant to.

#this is very much a time when cis people in idaho need to practice malicious compliance#bc everything in that comment IS technically illegal under that bill#it also makes donating a kidney or part of your liver a technical felony#same with skin grafts#oh and also blood draws#including blood sugar tests for diabetics#bc TECHNICALLY the blood isn’t diseased#it’s either the pancreas (type 1) or the inability of the liver & muscle cells to uptake excess glucose to store it as glycogen (type 2)#where the disease actually occurs#(and in peripheral tissues like limbs & eyes if diabetes isn’t managed properly)

I’m sorry sir I can’t donate blood, it’s a felony

(via marxistprincess)

[video]

Numbers don't lie: more Saudi attacks on Yemen came after new US support -

news-queue:

Friday marks the seventh anniversary of the Saudi-led military intervention against Yemen, and thanks to Saudi Arabia’s escalation with U.S. assistance, the violence seemingly gets worse everyday.

On the sixth anniversary, Biden’s recent inauguration inspired hope that the U.S. might successfully encourage the warring parties towards a ceasefire. Yet over the course of the past year, it became clear that the Biden administration supported Saudi and Emirati objectives in Yemen almost as actively as the Trump administration, although they veiled their preference for the Saudi-led coalition in a veneer of diplomacy.

A new brief from the Quincy Institute highlights ongoing U.S. assistance for the Saudi-led military intervention, despite Biden’s declaration that he would “end all American support for offensive operations in the war in Yemen, including relevant arms sales.” The administration paused two arms deals, but later proceeded with over a billion dollars in new sales to the kingdom. It characterized these weapons as defensive, yet as the brief argues, defensive capability converts directly to offensive advantage. By assisting Saudi Arabia and the UAE with defense, the U.S. allows these countries to attack Yemen with greater impunity. Further, both Saudi Arabia and the UAE already possess hundreds of billions of dollars in offensive weapons, mostly purchased from the United States, which they continue to use against Yemen.

Biden administration officials frequently condemn Houthi transborder attacks, yet fail to condemn Saudi air strikes. On February 10, 2021, State Department spokesperson Ned Price described the Houthis as “continually demonstrat[ing] a desire to prolong the war by attacking Saudi Arabia, including endangering civilians.” In August 2021, Secretary of State Antony Blinken stated that since the beginning of the year, Saudi Arabia “has endured more than 240 attacks by the Houthis.” On January 24, 2022, Tim Lenderking, the special envoy, emphasized “the U.S. government’s condemnation of the recent Houthi attacks against the UAE and Saudi Arabia that killed civilians.”

The problem with these statements is one of proportion. The administration’s narrative consistently blames the Houthis and stresses their transborder attacks as particularly dangerous, yet transborder attacks on Yemen carried out by the Saudi-led coalition far outnumber them and have been magnitudes more destructive.

Houthi transborder attacks never surpass and rarely even approach the number of coalition air raids conducted on Yemen each month. Crucially, with the help of U.S.–made defense systems, Saudi Arabia successfully deflects 90 percent of the Houthis’ transborder attacks.

The Saudi-led coalition has carried out more than 24,800 air raids since 2015, an average of almost 10 each day. Coalition air raids have killed almost 9,000 civilians and wounded more than 10,000.

Read More

(via marxistprincess)