cis lgb Americans keep saying “they’re coming for us next!!” in regards to the current political climate as if the republicans didn’t introduce over 300 anti-trans bills this past legislative session, many of which passed, including the forcible detransitioning of all trans youth in alabama. like huh?? you are not good trans allies.
the current political climate is possible because republicans made trans people a “wedge issue” and cis people haven’t been fighting with us for the last 5 years while states decimate trans rights
ALT
ALT
[ids in alt text]
cis lgb people you should care about your trans siblings
cis lgb people you should care about your trans siblings, not only because they’re the canary in the coal mine but also (ESPECIALLY) because they are PEOPLE and YOUR SIBLINGS
Oh look it’s the same reason why US companies are closing their apps in China because China has a personal information protection law explicitly modeled off the EU’s GDPR but amazingly you never hear people freaking out about “European authoritarianism”
House Bill 2319, sponsored by Rep. John Kavanagh, makes it illegal for anyone within 8 feet of law enforcement activity to record police. Violators could face a misdemeanor, but only after being verbally warned and continuing to record anyway.
Exceptions were made for people at the center of an interaction with police, anyone standing in an enclosed structure on private property where police activity was occurring and occupants of a vehicle stopped by police as long as recording in those instances didn’t interfere with police actions.
It goes into effect on Sept. 24.
Kavanagh wrote in an op-ed said HB 2319 was meant to protect officers from potential harm or distraction outside of the incident they were already involved in. He initially introduced the bill with a 15-foot restriction that was later amended down to address concerns it would be unconstitutional.
All the police in Arizona need to do to make recording police brutality even from a distance illegal now is directly approach someone collecting evidence of their potential misconduct and demand they surrender their recording device this is extremely obvious as cops are already known to attempt to intimidate bystanders to their violent crimes this way.
It’s not even “no slavery = no chocolate,” it’s just “no slavery = more expensive chocolate” so yeah no objections from me personally on this one
And the thing about “more expensive chocolate” is that it doesn’t even have to be more expensive to the CUSTOMERS…
It could be more expensive to the producers (Nestle) instead of passing on the extra cost to the people eating chocolate.
Nestle makes roughly $90 billion in profit every year. That’s pure profit.
They could stop using slavery, and still make upwards of $60 billion in profit every fucking year, and the consumer price of chocolate wouldn’t change at all.
But despite the fact that $60B is still a comically absurd amount of money and that they literally cannot spend it all, Nestle refuses to stop using slavery, and claims that if they did stop, consumers would have to pay more…. Y'know, in order to make sure they didn’t “lose” that extra $30B in profit.
I don’t care about convincing every cis person to drop their prejudices against trans people I care about taking away their power and ability to act on those prejudices in ways that harm us
“If a white man wants to lynch me, that’s his problem. If he’s got the power to lynch me, that’s my problem. Racism is not a question of attitude; it’s a question of power. Racism gets its power from capitalism. Thus, if you’re anti-racist, whether you know it or not, you must be anti-capitalist. The power for racism, the power for sexism, comes from capitalism, not an attitude.”