Radio Blue Heart is on the air!

Apr 20

marxistprincess:

queeranarchism:

r0ryy:

uzumaki-rebellion:

marxistprincess:

image

Conservatives literally want to be able to own whatever firearm they want and be able to mow us down with impunity so much so that when they can’t, when we too are armed they react like this fucking idiot

When the Black Panthers in Oakland started carrying to protect Black people, Regan changed open carry laws in California. Maga people only want guns to be used for what they want, violence and intimidation against anyone non-white, queer, or non-Christian. When any of those demographics stand up against the Maga clowns, all of sudden guns have to be regulated. The goalpost will always move inntheir interest to dominate others they hate.

“Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.“

— Frank Wilhoit

The good news is that for once we can all back the same tactics:

Either case, the answer is: give free guns to trans people.

image

How does having a gun protect you if you’re trans?

image

In case you’re too dumb to read this graphic should do well to explain

(via marxistprincess)

sepiachord:

image

Mausoleum

(via iamcinema)

anglophobia-official:

leninonlyfans:

byttyrs:

radfem girlies will literally be like “No True Lesbian has penetrative sex because penetration is intrinsically heterosexual” as if men aren’t regularly penetrating each other. like?

why is it always “imitative of heterosexuality” when the lesbians the sex wars were waged against were literally doing this in the same room as gay men doing the same sex acts using the same terminology and semiotics

radfems literally constantly forget gay men exist because their entire analysis falls apart with like, the slightest acknowledgement of their existence

i think its kinda the opposite though. like do you all remember that guy who was bragging about breaking his windpipe sucking dick on twitter? if you don’t let me tell you, terfs circulated this for weeks/months talking about how disgusting and violent it was.

terf homophobia is part of an ongoing, decades-long campaign to associate all gender nonconformity - including regular cis gays having regular gay sex - with “male violence”.

and since violence needs a victim, they have constructed the idea of a woman to use to this end, the same way conservatives use children: as helpless non-persons, zero-autonomy vessels who have no desires of their own and must be isolated “protected” from the deviance of outside agitators “males”.

they reuse this image over and over again: against sex workers, trans men, comparing gender-affirming care to FGM, etc

they don’t care if any of this shit “falls apart” under scrutiny, any more than a white supremacist does. the obvious falseness is part of the tactic they’re employing

(ie: “never believe that anti-Semites are completely unaware of the absurdity of their replies”)

(via johnbrownfunclubofficial)

[video]

roadtonothing:

image

movieposters1:

image

tinysaurus-rex:
“earth-tooth:
“dont support industries that are driving animals to extinction thank you!
”
Already reblogged one of these but another reminder: don’t by nautilus shells!
”

tinysaurus-rex:

earth-tooth:

dont support industries that are driving animals to extinction thank you!

Already reblogged one of these but another reminder: don’t by nautilus shells!

(via johnbrownfunclubofficial)

(via stilded)