Join World History Encyclopedia as they sit down with author and historian James Lacey to chat all about Rome: Strategy of Empire, the first work to lay out Roman strategic thinking from its start under Augustus until its final demise in 476 CE
From Octavian’s victory at Actium (31 bc) to its traditional endpoint in the West (476), the Roman Empire lasted a solid 500 years—an impressive number by any standard, and fully one-fifth of all recorded history. In fact, the decline and final collapse of the Roman Empire took longer than most other empires even existed. Any historian trying to unearth the grand strategy of the Roman Empire must, therefore, always remain cognizant of the time scale, in which she is dealing.
Although the pace of change in the Roman era never approached that of the modern era, it was not an empire in stasis. While the visible trappings may have changed little, the challenges Rome faced at its end were vastly different than those faced by Augustus and the Julio-Claudians. Over the centuries, the Empire’s underlying economy, political arrangements, military affairs, and, most importantly, the myriad of external threats it faced were in constant flux, making adaptability to changing circumstances as important to Roman strategists as it is to strategists of the modern era.
By employing an expansive definition of strategy and by focusing much of the narrative on crucial historical moments and the personalities involved, James Lacey provides a comprehensive, persuasive, and engaging account of the rise and fall of the Roman Empire. It assimilates the most recent work of classical historians and archaeologists to correct the flaws and omissions of previous accounts, thus presenting the most complete and nuanced narrative of Roman strategic thinking and execution ever published.
— CHAPTERS —
0:00 Introduction
0:51 James Jacey’s background
6:00 Focus of the book - the strategy of Ancient Rome
17:34 Modern-day strategy and its links with Ancient Roman strategy
35:19 Outro
like if you come up on the fbi’s radar for whatever reason some paperpusher can totally fuck you over for reasons that make no sense outside of like, whatever office incentives they’re faced with, just with their “investigation” powers, they don’t need to convict you of anything
also there’s civil asset forfeiture, they can take your money and your stuff, they don’t have to prove you broke a law. They don’t even really have to do official asset forfeiture, they can confiscate stuff as part of an investigation and then “lose” it when they finally decide they’re not charging you with a crime
are we really dunking on republicans now by saying the fbi are our friends
EDIT: also marijuana possession is against federal law
Also I want to break federal laws.
Everything people above have said!
The true response to the “if they do this to the President they’ll do it to you!” is that they already do it to you! Every day! The FBI isn’t your friend! It’s only exceptionally weird now bc they went after someone rich and powerful this time
Any response either siding with Trump or using carceral logic is bad. The good response is ‘let them fight’
